Sustainability reporting is no longer just a finance function. With the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) raising the bar, procurement is now on the front line of ESG compliance. For many procurement professionals, sustainability reporting has historically been a CFO-led exercise. But that separation is no longer viable. The CSRD makes one thing clear: environmental and social performance are now inseparable from how companies procure, manage supply chains, and deliver goods and services. 

Why Procurement Must Act Now

The CSRD expands the scope of mandatory sustainability reporting from roughly 11,000 to 50,000 companies across the EU. Importantly, it requires detailed disclosures on supply chain emissions (Scope 3), human rights due diligence, and supplier environmental practices. Many organisations will need to begin collecting 2025 data for 2026 disclosures. That means procurement and finance must act now to build the foundations for credible, auditable, and aligned reporting. 

As a procurement and supply chain consultancy, we’ve seen the urgency grow in recent months. Procurement leaders are fielding new requests from finance, data teams, and auditors, while managing increased supplier enquiries on sustainability compliance. This moment represents a pivot point: those who proactively align procurement and finance will be best positioned to comply, innovate, and lead in ESG performance. 

The Crux: Why Procurement–Finance Alignment Matters

Traditionally, CFOs have overseen ESG disclosures, often with limited visibility into operational or supply chain realities. Conversely, procurement teams have managed supplier compliance and engagement, often without input into corporate reporting frameworks or investor-facing narratives. The CSRD and related frameworks (such as ESRS, IFRS S1/S2, and CSDDD) require a joint approach for three reasons: 

  1. Scope 3 Emissions Dominance 
    Over 70% of a typical company’s carbon footprint lies in Scope 3 emissions, most of which fall under procurement’s remit. Finance teams will need accurate, defensible data from suppliers, and procurement owns the relationships and channels to obtain it. 
  2. Auditability and Assurance 
    Under the CSRD, sustainability data must be assured to similar standards as financial data. That means procurement-driven information (e.g. supplier environmental audits, due diligence outcomes, product lifecycle data) must stand up to scrutiny, be traceable, and align with financial systems.
  3. Materiality and Risk Integration 
    Double materiality assessments will require procurement and finance to jointly assess supply chain risks –  from biodiversity loss to social impact –  and report on how they influence corporate strategy and financial performance. 
Practical Guidance: How to Align Procurement and Finance

Based on our client engagements, here are four steps organisations can take now to enable alignment between CFOs and procurement leaders: 

  1. Build a Joint ESG Data Framework
  • Map out which sustainability data is held by procurement (e.g. supplier ESG questionnaires, contract clauses, audit data) and which resides in finance. 
  • Establish common definitions, data owners, and traceability protocols. Avoid duplication or conflicting metrics by co-creating a single source of truth. 
  1. Integrate Sustainability into Supplier Performance Management
  • Embed CSRD-relevant criteria (e.g. GHG emissions, labour practices, circularity) into SRM frameworks. 
  • Establish regular review cycles that feed data into finance and ESG reporting processes. Automate wherever possible to ensure data is timely and consistent. 
  1. Conduct a Joint Materiality & Risk Mapping Exercise
  • Co-lead a double materiality assessment involving finance, procurement, risk, and compliance teams. 
  • Identify high-impact supplier categories and geographies; prioritise deep dives and third-party audits accordingly. 
  1. Embed ESG into Procurement Governance & Investment Cases
  • Work with finance to integrate sustainability KPIs into investment decisions, total cost of ownership models, and procurement policies. 
  • Ensure supplier incentives (e.g. preferred status, volume awards) are aligned with sustainability performance. 
Looking Ahead & Bridging the Say-Do Gap

As scrutiny intensifies, companies can no longer afford a disconnect between sustainability commitments and operational reality. The CSRD demands not just bold ESG statements, but verifiable action – especially across supply chains. Procurement is where the “say-do gap” often lives or dies. By embedding ESG into governance and data practices, organisations can turn intent into credible, auditable outcomes. 

Aligning procurement and finance isn’t just about compliance, it’s a strategic imperative. Those who bridge this gap will unlock value through stronger risk management, supplier relationships, and investor trust. 

At 4C Associates, we help procurement teams build ESG capabilities, align with financial reporting, and lead the shift to sustainable, transparent supply chains. If you’re navigating CSRD implementation, now is the time to act. Reach out to Allison Ford-Langstaff or Daniel Walsh to learn more.